Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Scroll to top

Top

Why Surrey needs the next transit expansion

Why Surrey needs the next transit expansion

There is a growing debate as to which city will have the next transit expansion, Vancouver or Surrey? There are compelling arguments for both sides of the debate. The Broadway corridor is an important regional destination and Surrey is one of the fastest-growing cities in Canada. We need to decide how we will shape the future of our region; this is a crucial decision that will affect development for decades. The debate isn’t just about where the next transit line will be built. The expansion will shape the future decisions of hundreds of thousands of people. It’s imperative that we build a transit expansion in Surrey and offer an affordable lifestyle for people from all over the region. More buses isn’t going to cut it, Surrey needs a Skytrain connection from King George to Langley.

The Broadway corridor is undoubtedly an important employment and education destination. There is impressive density along West Broadway. Some are calling it Vancouver’s second downtown. There are influential locations like the Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver City Hall, and of course, UBC. Moreover, there are thousands of subsidized students transiting all the way to UBC. The 99 B-line travels along Broadway, and it’s usually full. The fact is that in Commercial skytrain station there are commuters left stranded, and for many advocates, it’s unacceptable. There is demand for more efficient transit because it would benefit the students, residents, and workers who use the corridor frequently. If they build a rapid rail transit to UBC, it will reduce the travel times.

Personally, I’ve commuted to both UBC and SFU. The UBC commute is long and inconvenient, but so is the SFU commute. The 145 B-Line from Production Way/ University skytrain station to SFU on Burnaby Mountain is comparable to the 99 B-Line in Commercial station, people get left behind at both! All too often a full bus drives by and leaves disappointed commuters waiting for the next one. It would be nice to have a gondola or Skytrain going up to Burnaby Mountain, but it doesn’t necessarily mean that we need one. It’s irritating to get left behind by a bus, but it’s a B-Line and there will be another one in 5 minutes. I disagree with the notion that Translink and the province should decide on its next major investment because some commuters don’t want to wait for the next bus.

As we all know, the city of Surrey is an affordable housing option that is destined to continue growing much faster than Vancouver. There are half a million people living in Surrey and thousands move in every month. In the coming decades, much of the population growth in Metro Vancouver will be centered in and around Surrey. It offers qualities needed by the middle-class, like affordable housing and pre-secondary education. In the future, owning a home and raising a family will likely be done south of Fraser.

Frankly, there aren’t enough incentives in Surrey for people to take public transit. There are lengthy commutes, and expensive bus passes. Most buses in Surrey lead to and from the Surrey Central skytrain station. Most of the residents in Surrey do not live in the Surrey Central area and have to bus there, which takes a long time. For example, a supposedly 15 minute bus ride from Fleetwood to Surrey Central turns in to an extra one hour commute per day. There’s the time to walk to the bus stop (pray you didn’t miss it), and wait for it to arrive; two ways each day, and not to mention the Skytrain ride and more. Thus, many Surrey residents choose to not take transit. They drive cars and I don’t blame them. There are only 4 stations in Surrey; Vancouver has 20 stations.  Municipalities in the south of the Fraser are underserved by Translink.

An extension of the Skytrain line all the way to Langley Centre will allow for a complete restructuring of the bus system in Surrey and Langley. Presently, most buses travel to and from the north-west part of the city. Whether a bus comes from Newton, Fleetwood, or Guildford; most of them go to or from Surrey City Centre. Suppose there was a Skytrain heading down Fraser Highway. Some bus routes would arrive at a Skytrain station much faster because they don’t have to go to Surrey Central anymore. Translink can reorganize routes to travel to the new stations. From Langley to Surrey Central, a train ride could take 20 minutes; instead of a bus ride of 50 minutes. Everyone will greatly benefit from this change, whether they drive or transit. There will be reduced traffic and more mobility through the city. For instance, those that give their friends or family a ride to a Skytrain station will travel for a less amount of time. Of course, those that live close to a new station could now walk there. These are the benefits that can be won with rapid rail transit.

A modern city should have an extensive transit network and smart urban planning. If they prolong a transit expansion in Surrey, then the car culture and externalities will continue. It’s important to get people out of their cars and taking public transit. The future of Surrey ought to be green, affordable, and transit-friendly. The city will continue maturing and soon it will surpass Vancouver in population.

That’s why the future lives in Surrey.

Jorge Adrian Quiroz

Comments

  1. I agree with you completely but think it’s very important for transit activists in the region to ensure that these projects are not merely done in sequence, but rather that the Surrey project begins as soon as possible, prior to the completion of the Evergreen Line. In this we should also be ready to launch the Broadway line within one to two years of the Evergreen Line’s completion, preferably as close as to that completion as possible.

    I think it is really critical that we emphasize the completion of these projects and the primary rapid transit network should be complete by the early 2020s. Frankly, this could be accomplished if transit projects from here on out were given the same sort of regional prioritization by the Province as highway projects.

    Getting it all done on this schedule would be for the best for Surrey, Vancouver and all the whole of the region.

  2. “The best transportation plan is a good land use plan”. Surrey truly needs transit investment now. If not, the land use will be zoned for cars, and as a compounding problem, the transportation investment needed in Surrey if nothing is done now will quadruple the current cost. Surrey IS the fastest growing city in BC, and likely Western Canada.

    The Reason Surrey needs Rapid Transit now, isn’t only because it will save a few people a dozen minutes on the 321 or 502 and isn’t because Surrey has been neglected for the past 20 years. It’s precisely as you state, “The future lives here”. Transit is NEEDED to shape the future. Broadway is already shaped, and there is little doubt that they will get Rapid Transit. Investors already know that there will be a future station at Main and Broadway, thus the highrise devolpments. But in Surrey? maybe there’s going to be a station at Fraser and 88th, so maybe we should start building highrises there? But we are far from sure. So the only safe decision is to keep buying up land and expanding in Surrey through sprawl and auto dependency.

    I’m not saying that Vancouver doesn’t need rapid transit, anybody that takes the 99-B would not have any doubt. But Surrey needs it more urgently.

    Frankly, what we should do is not let the Province Divide and Conquer, or Divide and Delay. Think about all the divisions between Transit Enthusiasts: Surrey vs Vancouver, LRT vs RRT, Property tax vs Sales tax… and while the newspapers and urban blogs in Metro YVR put Translink’s 3 year studies front page, the billion dollar massey tunnel and Pattullo Replacement gets to slip through? I’m upset, not only at the province, but also at all the Transit lobbyists who can’t unite. So lets just propose a solution. Unite and Conquer.

    http://pricetags.wordpress.com/2013/02/22/unite-and-conquer-surrey-first-vancouver-asap/

  3. Tessa

    Why is it that road projects are all built at the same time regardless of any budget concerns, yet to build transit projects the province insists the region fight amongst each other to decide who goes first, raise funds themselves and wait for eons until the right political moment? That’s the question we should be asking.

    Of course both projects are needed. And it’s disappointing to read your writing that Broadway is just about making it so people don’t have to wait longer. The Broadway line will increase transit use dramatically and immediately, according to Translink’s own numbers, and improve connectivity between Richmond and Burnaby, just as Surrey rapid transit is needed to shape growth in the region.

    This whole “who goes first” debate is really sad and counterproductive, and it leads us to make terrible snipes at each other when we should be working together against the real enemy: the province and their addiction to road building.

  4. Rico

    Agree with Tessa that the who goes first debate is counterproductive but…..even though most of my trips start SoF a Broadway line will increase the number of destinations I am likely to use more than all 3 proposed Surrey corridors. The sheer numbers (boardings) difference between Broadway and Surrey is staggering (of course so is the cost). If one option must go first it should be Broadway (at least central Broadway, UBC not so much), the only arguement that could be made for Surrey first is growth shaping. Which begs the question why did it take until very recently for Surrey to get its act together downtown (still has poor urban form elsewhere) when Port Moody was able to do it without any Skytrain? Don’t use a lack of Skytrain as a crutch, plan appropriately, zone appropriately…..That said there has been progress made lately, lets keep improving.

  5. MED

    Beware of Yonge Street Subway syndrome… they are planning to extend that Toronto subway out to Richmond Hill, despite the fact that it’s already jam-packed in rush hour to the point where people closer to downtown have trouble getting onto ANY train, not just the first one by. You not only need service to Surrey, you need additional routes to downtown – which benefit everyone all over the city.

    Of course, that means a much much higher cost, which suggests the region will instead end up (eventually!) with one extended, overloaded line built with a multitude of cost compromises.