Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Scroll to top

Top

B-Line finally comes to Surrey under new TransLink plan

First, the good news: Surrey’s long promised King George B-Line will soon be in service, according to TransLink’s new 2013 Base Plan. The route, originally planned to travel from Guildford, through City Centre, to White Rock, will now end at Newton, whose bus exchange will be upgraded. The B-Line will provide service every 7.5 minutes along this busy transit corridor. Surrey residents will also appreciate upgrades to Surrey Central SkyTrain station, which will add a third entrance to the station and improve the bus exchange, and the Hwy 1 Rapid Bus, with highway coaches every 10 minutes during morning and evening rush hours between Langley and Braid station.

The Base Plan is being funded through additional service optimization, transit “right-sizing”, reduced weekend frequencies for SkyTrain, and new or increased rates at all Park and Rides. The South Surrey Park and Ride, already facing a lack of capacity, will benefit from the new $2 minimum daily rate, which should relieve some pressure on the site.

While the majority of services will not be cut or reduced, and some new improvements are being funded, this plan does not meet the region’s long term needs and eliminates 306,000 bus hours that had been planned, while also failing to restore full funding to roads and cycling. No money is provided for the construction of rapid transit along Broadway or in Surrey.

A significant portion of funding under this three year plan is coming from TransLink’s financial reserves, a fund introduced to help ensure the stability of the organization through periods of revenue instability. It is also based on $30 million from a time-limited property tax, previously approved by the Mayor’s Council, but contingent on a funding alternative that has been denied by the Province – the Mayors have previously stated that they would like to revoke the tax increase, which would necessitate a new plan and service cuts.

Of even more concern is the volatility and declining revenues from the fuel tax. The 17 cent gas tax is TransLink’s second largest source of revenue and is expected to bring in $144 million less over the next three years than previously anticipated. This decrease is attributed to less people driving, more efficient vehicles, and people filling up outside Metro Vancouver.

The plan is a reasonable compromise in the immediate. With vocal pressure from politicians and the public to find “efficiencies” within the organization, TransLink has remained steadfast in appeasing to such demands and produced a plan that fits the bill. Fortunately, in large part to drawing down the reserve fund, they will be able to fund long promised bus services to the South Fraser and make much needed capacity upgrades to some of the busiest SkyTrain stations.

However, this is not the end of TransLink’s funding woes. With the decline in fuel tax, and the reduction in reserve funding, a new, more stable revenue source will be needed just to keep existing services a float. Additional funding will also be required to build the multi-billion dollar rapid transit expansions in Vancouver and Surrey. Meanwhile, the provincial government refuses to even begin a conversation around funding sources, leaving the region poised to face increasing congestion and our transport network on life-support.

Comments

  1. John O'Brian

    If there aren’t reasonable feeder routes in the regions served by the South Surrey Park & Ride (there aren’t, that’s why people use it) then relieving pressure also means driving people back to their cars for the whole commute. This is all grim news.
    Regarding the Surrey B-Line, hurray for keeping the successful branding, I’ll believe it when I see it.

  2. Personally I think the mayors should just give translink the property tax and be done with it. It is the easiest, fastest, and fairest way to get money for transit around here.
    People with cheaper house who have less transit pay less so areas like SOF mean while where transit already is great they have more expensive land thus paying more to push transit out towards the areas that need it while covering their own transit

  3. Jesse L Hausner

    The priority needs to be finding a funding source outside of the fuel tax. I do think a property tax for the entire region would make more sense to transition that direction. Using fuel tax in the first place was doomed to failure anyway since the goal of Translink was to reduce vehicle use which means as you meet your goal you reduce your revenue. It’s a catch 22 and a given we’d be in this situation today.

    Revenue needs to be fixed and it needs to be single sourced. I’d prefer they remove the entire gas tax and just replace it with a property tax personally. Everyone benefits from transit and road services, not just the people driving motor vehicles.