Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Scroll to top

Top

Living car free in Surrey

Car-free in New York City

Car free? In Surrey?

Yes, it is possible, and no, it’s not too much of a pain, thanks to long range planning and recent investments in transit. And with a range of transport innovations coming on stream, going car free will soon become easier than ever.

Why am I car free?

More than anything, driving is expensive. As a teen, my parents weren’t willing to buy me a car and pay for the expense. I chose to direct my minimal, part time job earnings towards eating out with friends or seeing movies. The provincial driving restrictions for graduated learners just added another level of inconvenience to car use while young.

Last summer, I actually had to use a car as part of the Census brigade. I was able to borrow my grandparents’ second vehicle, though I had to pay for insurance and gas. Ironically, even though I only activated it for three months, I ended up in a death spiral where I was both driving so I could work, and working so I could drive. My pay was so low, and driving expenses were so high, that there was little money left after making my vehicle payments. During this time, I also discovered that during rush hour, driving was only slightly faster than my regular bus route!

Location, location, location

If I were traveling around my community of Cloverdale, being car free would be a struggle. For one reason or another though, most of my life is oriented along the SkyTrain network. Most of my friends live along it and the SFU campuses are all connected by it. For a night out, I can SkyTrain downtown and walk around.

If I want to see a movie, I can visit Scotiabank near Burrard, Tinseltown near Stadium, Silvercity at Metrotown, and, just opened recently, Landmark at New West. If I need to mail something, I can drop it off at Shoppers at Commercial-Broadway. If I want to visit Whole Foods, it’s just a block from Broadway-City Hall. If I’m going on a trip, I can take the Canada Line to YVR. For a visit to Lonsdale Quay, I can transfer to SeaBus.

What makes the SkyTrain even more convenient is the network’s speed and its consistency. I know that a train is going to come at least every five minutes, barring a track intrusion or haywire car set. And with travel time from one end of the Expo Line to the other at about 40 minutes, the trip is not overly long either.

How I live car free

As described above, most of my travel is along the SkyTrain. I predominantly use the Expo Line, with occasional trips on the Millennium and Canada Lines. My main bus in Surrey – the 320 – comes every 30 minutes throughout the weekdays, and although the route is a bit slow and circuitous for my liking, it gets me to Surrey Central. Five years ago, frequencies were much worse on the 320 and other Surrey buses. Now, outside of Sunday schedules, I know that I won’t have to wait an hour if I miss a bus.

Technology has helped significantly. Five years ago, you had to plan your trip via paper schedules or through TransLink’s website. With my iPhone, I now have a variety of options to plan my travel. With the built-in Google Maps app linked to TransLink schedule data, I can instantly bring up several transit trip options and choose my favourite. When I’m at an unfamiliar stop, I can text the bus stop number to view when the next one comes, allowing me to decide whether to wait or try different options (this happens frequently on Robson Street where walking is usually faster!). Recently, I’ve started using the independent Next Bus app, which shows me real-time arrival times. If the bus is late and I’m wondering what’s going on, I use TransLink’s new mobile real time map, which shows me where the bus is along the route.

Baby I can drive a car

I’ve recently added car sharing to my spectrum of transport options. Zipcar and Modo have never really appealed to me as the costs seem high and the inflexibility frustrating (you have to return the car to the same spot you got it from). car2go completely blew up the car sharing model and has created a fantastic service for Vancouverites. With a fleet of hundreds of smart cars around the city, users can check out a car and park it anywhere, paying by the minute. With an iPhone app, I can see if there are any available vehicles nearby, set a 15 minute reservation on the vehicle of choice, and check it out using a car2go smart card. When I’m done, I just park in any residential permit area, and check it out with the card.

I’ve been using car2go on late nights after a movie downtown. The bus that I’d usually take – the 17 – is quite a distance from the theatres and runs on reduced frequencies at that time. When splitting the cost with my boyfriend, car2go ends up being equivalent to the cost of a one-zone fare, if that.

Celebrating its one year anniversary and phenomenal adoption rate, car2go recently expanded its service zone east to Renfrew and south to 49th, covering almost the entire City of Vancouver. While I know that this service requires a certain density and demography to function, and thus will be unlikely to arrive in Surrey anytime soon, it is a very convenient option when visiting Vancouver.

Car share options like car2go really fill a mobility void – either when transit is not a great choice, or when taxis are too expensive! Sometimes taking a car makes the trip much more convenient and enjoyable, and car shares allow you that choice without having to commit to paying gas, insurance, or vehicle payments.

Riding on two wheels

Bikes are beginning to see their big day too. While I personally don’t use my bike on a daily basis, I have taken it on the bus and SkyTrain and found the experience fairly convenient. I have a cheap, heavy mountain bike from Canadian Tire, but it gets the job done. My boyfriend, who currently lives in Vancouver, has made biking a daily transport option. He regularly bikes to work on Broadway and sometimes ventures into downtown for meetings. When we move to Surrey, he’ll be storing his bike at a secure locker at Commercial-Broadway station, allowing him to SkyTrain in and then complete the trip to work on bike rather than B-Line if the day is nice.

When Downtown, I often will walk to my destinations as the trip feels fairly quick, there’s lot to look at, and the buses are rather slow. However, if a bike share was active in Vancouver, I suspect I would use it quite often. My destinations are usually a fair distance from the SkyTrain stations, and grabbing a bike to get there would shorten the commute in half at least. With the new separated bike lanes, I would feel confident enough to ride downtown – I can say with certainty that without them I would not be thinking about biking in Vancouver. When the long promised bike share is launched, I have no doubt it will join my car free transport options. If successful downtown, I hope to see it replicated at UBC and other regional town centres.

Car free in Downtown Surrey

Holland Park Surrey City Centre BCWith my impending move to Downtown Surrey from Cloverdale, I will soon be located directly on the SkyTrain line and cut my travel time in half with the removal of my 320 bus ride. However, it has got me thinking about some of the car free travel options in Vancouver and how they could be adapted to suit our future downtown.

Walking in Downtown Surrey is a bit of a drag. The blocks feel long and there’s not much to look at. While I enjoy walking University Drive, from 108th to 104th, and through Holland Park, the rest of the City Centre is far from a pedestrian haven. Yes, there’s sidewalk connectivity, but that doesn’t make for a good experience. This reality has me questioning whether I’ll walk to buy my groceries or just hop on the SkyTrain and head to New West or Metrotown. That possibility of living in Surrey but leaving town for everything should concern politicians and planners looking to make a strong and complete downtown. I realize that much of this can be solved over time through re-development, but there needs to be a recognition of this reality today too.

Biking can solve a lot of the downtown’s distance issues. While many stores are located at Central City, there’s still a range of big box retail lining King George, which is great to access if you drive, but not so convenient if you’re car free. The distances needed to travel to these destinations are perfect for biking. While I recognize the City has striped bike lanes of some of the main streets in the downtown, the infrastructure is nowhere near what it needs to be to making biking the mode of choice downtown.

With fairly quiet streets outside of rush hour, there’s more than enough room to build separated bike lanes on major roads like University Drive, Old Yale Road, Whalley Boulevard or 102 Ave. Furthermore, building the infrastructure now, before all the new development comes in, will help cement downtown as a place where active and sustainable transportation gets priority over cars, an essential component of a real city centre. With the infrastructure in place, and a growing population, a bike share could be a reality with time.

Car sharing could also help fill the mobility gap downtown. Whether its to get to a restaurant in the City Centre, go shopping at Guildford, visit a friend in Delta, or go swimming at Newton Wave Pool, car sharing would help supplement the existing transit options, which are rather hit-or-miss for travel within the Surrey borders.

Century Group, the developers of CityPoint at Gateway, included a car share space in their towers. Modo, a locally owned and operated car share service, currently has one car in that tower, and has brought another one to the City-owned parking lot at the Rec Centre. The hassle with Modo is that I would have to return to vehicle to these spots, removing much of the convenience factor. If a Modo vehicle was located in my building, Park Place, I suspect I would use it from time to time. A car2go service would be the optimum solution, but again, this depends on mode shares, densities, demographics, and destinations, meaning it’ll be some time before it comes to Surrey.

Light rail transit within Surrey would be the biggest game changer. The biggest reason I can be car free is because of the SkyTrain connection. When we bring those rapid transit connections to other parts of the City, more and more people will be able to make that switch. Within the downtown, we won’t be able to reduce the insane width of King George, or reduce the traffic driving along 104th, until those alternatives are built across the City. People need to have that transit option to get downtown, otherwise they will continue to drive here, negating the densification wins of new development. To create a true downtown where people are the priority over cars, more Surrey communities need that rapid transit connectivity.

How do we accelerate the shift?

With regards to walking, the City needs to be far more aggressive in its development plans. Pedestrians cannot and should not only be the priority at Central City plaza. The City needs to have a better future road network plan with a smaller grid designed for people over cars. All developments within the downtown should be required to include either urban residential frontages or street level retail to activate the sidewalk and make the urban landscape more interesting and safe.

The City should start building a separated bike network downtown now, before new residents become too accustomed to wide lanes, long roads, and narrow, fading bike routes. Vancouver’s design template of movable planters to physically separated bikes from cars provides Surrey with a great method of greening the streets cheaply while improving cyclist safety. Biking should me a mode of choice downtown.

We need to do research on the effects of living next to SkyTrain. Previous studies from the 90′s showed that residents living next to Joyce Station in East Vancouver have a dramatically lower car ownership rate than the norm. What is the situation like in Surrey? Are all the people moving into Quattro, Urban Village, CityPoint, and Park Place driving cars? These developments obtained permission to slightly reduce the amount of parking required – was it too much, not enough, or just right? Are these new residents using cars as their primary mode or are they riding SkyTrain most of the time? We need to do this research to help guide further build out of the downtown.

How can the City make car sharing more viable downtown? By duplicating and expanding the efforts done at CityPoint. If every new tower or condo included at least one car share spot, open to residents and the public, residents who are car-free will be much more likely to use the service. Have the City work with existing car share services to see what else can be done to grow the market of users. Modo and the City should be doing far more to tell residents about the existence of the car share option downtown, whether through direct mail drops or advertising on SkyTrain. There needs to be a two pronged approach to expand both the infrastructure and the knowledge base about car sharing.

And of course, the City needs to be more direct and creative about its plans for Light Rail. Its current whisper campaign is not enough to secure Light Rail for Surrey. The major impediment to getting it off the ground is money, which is where we need the Mayor and Council to come up with politically acceptable funding plans for LRT and champion them loudly to the community, to TransLink, and to the Province.

In conclusion

Living car free in Surrey is possible, but there’s more work to do to make it an increasingly attractive and viable option for residents. We need to recommit to build complete, compact, walkable communities connected by frequent and convenient rapid transit. We must supplement transport options in these places with safe, separated bike lanes, and flexible, low cost car share services. In return, we will have a community where congestion is low, where obesity is on the decline, where air quality is improved, where emissions are reduced, and where livability is high.

Comments

  1. Erik V

    I just want to say I think the car2go model of car sharing could work here.
    If they had spots in each of the town centres around surrey and Langley and white rock beach I’m sure they would be used a lot to travel between the town centres

    • Paul Hillsdon

      I agree that specific zones in the town centres could theoretically work for Surrey, but I still don’t think there’s a large enough market right now

  2. Adrian Q

    Living without a car is possible and enjoyable when we are single and live in an area where others walk as well. For those days where we would like the convenience of a car, services like car2go can fulfill the market need.

    I want to further emphasize that if downtown surrey is built with transit/ bike/ pedestrian friendly road networks then the residents will never feel like something is being taken away from them. Years ago in mexico city the city removed two lanes in one of the busiest roads in the city, Avenida Insurgentes. How do some vancouver commuters feel about the newly implemented bike lanes? The people in Canada and Mexico are upset because they feel they are losing something. So if Surrey implements these networks before it becomes highly densified we can avoid the problems of having a dense area and then trying tk make it more transit/ pedestrian friendly.

    • Jesse L Hausner

      Absolutely. I keep saying that when roads are widened or re-paved, Surrey really should on EVERY road be putting in correct side walks, correct bike lanes, and then the car traffic lanes. The major roads should take this into account.

      I’d further push that on routes like Fraser Highway they should have a little curb between the bike lanes and the roadway just to add a slight buffer. It also will prevent the cars from kicking loads of dirt and rocks into the bike lanes. I found when we road up Fraser Highway that in stretches I spent more time avoiding giant pot holes or rocks and dirt all over the place rather than enjoying the ride. While having the lanes were/are nice, this would just make it a slightly more pleasant experience.

      We all seem to forget that many bike routes aren’t even used by “commuters” or “adults living car free” and the majority I actually see using them out here in Surrey are kids. I know when I was younger I rode my bike everywhere and there were lots of areas back then where us kids on our bikes and cars were in conflict. In the end right of way or not, if a kid is hit by a car, the car will win. So rather than hinder cars, improving the bike network also helps those children get out, play, and enjoy their neighborhood more.

      • Paul Hillsdon

        Completely agree. I used to bike around Cloverdale with my cousin as a kid and would always ride on the sidewalk rather than the bike lane. White paint on the road just doesn’t feel safe.

        Separating bikes from sidewalks is critical in a downtown environment where that potential for pedestrian conflict is so much higher. Biking on sidewalks might work in the burbs, but urban environments should have separate infrastructure for peds, bikes, and cars.

        • Erik V

          I’m with you on the paint bike lanes on roads not being safe. There is nothing to stop cars from sliding over into the lanes and hitting someone. which I can say from experience
          I was hit by car when I was young while riding in the bike lanes on 102 ave.(which is a less busy road with bike lanes) I was lucky nothing seriously bad happened

    • Paul Hillsdon

      I’m glad others feel the same about putting in infrastructure before more people move in. It’s a lot easier to do it now rather than have people feel like lanes are being taken away from them in the future.

  3. Tim

    I suggested to Vince at Surrey Engineering that University BVLD can have the right lane dedicated to cycling as a temporary measure until the greenway network is complete in that area. The 4 lane roads do not have enough traffic to warrant them for now. He thought it was a good idea. Your post reinforces my thinking.

    I ride University Bvld southbound everyday on my way back from Burnaby. It is a quiet ride but it would be nice to have the space dedicated for cyclists so new residents get used to cycling to destinations instead of driving.

    • Paul Hillsdon

      What a great idea. Earlier I was thinking 102 would be a good candidate for a separated bike lane, but the small treed boulevard would be a hinderance. Doing one on University ties in with the Parkway route and there’s no traffic issues with removing a lane. Let’s get on this!

  4. Ellen Wos

    Car free in Surrey is possible, yes. But only if you live close to bus routes and shopping. Being single and doing it is one thing, but try having a family and having to go here, there and everywhere while walking and taking the bus. Not a great option for most, especially when you are living in Cloverdale.

    • Jesse L Hausner

      That’s very true. But I think your point is typical of anywhere in the lower mainland not just in the burbs. The only people I ever hear talking about being completely car free are < 30 years old and single or students in fairly basic jobs along skytrain routes.

      Once you move to the world of raising a family it becomes a whole other ball game. Having a car just makes life so much easier. I know a lot of people all over the city many of which are raising families and those that live in Vancouver, all of them have cars. Even 1 couple who lives right downtown and could technically walk everywhere. They still have a car because it is simply easier to bring children to the doctor with a car. Or if you go grocery shopping the speed and ease is increased with a car.

      That's why I think the push to get rid of cars is a pipe dream and we should focus more of our efforts towards making other modes of transportation easier and less conflicting with cars. We'll never get rid of them though. They will be non-polluting and environmentally friendly LONG before any massive reduction will take hold in which case it won't matter anymore.

      I do think reducing car use though is a good thing and areas especially downtown areas like in Surrey need to focus on making it not a car centric area.

      But you are spot on. I wouldn't dream of raising a family without at least 1 car. I happen to actually have 2. My sports car I use day to day, and my pickup I use for camping and hunting. My truck is parked most of the year and only comes out to play when I go on longer journeys with a load of gear. I don't think based on our lifestyle that my girlfriend and I could function without at least both. But we do take the bikes out more often now living in downtown Surrey because it is just nicer and more calming.

      • Nick

        The environment isn’t the only thing to consider when talking about reducing car travel. Increasing modes of active transportation are vitally important for increasing individuals physical activity and improving public health. While non-polluting cars would be great for decreasing air pollution and the health problems associated with it, they would do nothing for increasing physical activity or decreasing traffic injuries.

        In reply to the blog post, I think it is interesting that living car-free in Surrey for you mainly means using the SkyTrain to access destinations in Vancouver, Burnaby and NewWest, and not Surrey. Hopefully as Surrey Central develops more completely, this will change. There are plans for decreasing the lengths of blocks in this area, which along with more dense development, should make active transportation in the area more attractive.

        • Paul Hillsdon

          Yes, I suppose it doesn’t mean much to live in Surrey if I don’t utilize its services, shops, or access its community!

          • I think it is interesting that living car-free in Surrey for you mainly means using the SkyTrain to access destinations in Vancouver, Burnaby and NewWest, and not Surrey.

            I found myself thinking the same. It’s certainly a great start though, and a way to get into the proper mindset for when more local options present themselves. (Otherwise it’s more like sleeping car-free in Surrey ;)

      • Paul Hillsdon

        I agree that cars will always be around, but I think the mode share should essentially be flipped. They should be our 20% transport, not our 80%. With the right planning and livable densities that we’re headed to, that shouldn’t be a problem in the future. Location of jobs is a bigger issue as you noted. We need to be doing much more to centralize workplaces in town centres rather than suburban office parks. Living in an urban environment makes no sense if we still need cars to get to jobs in the boonies.

        While I don’t want to make a judgement, the reasoning behind owning a second vehicle is curious to me. It seems as though we often buy vehicles based on the off chance we might use a feature. For example, buying an SUV over a car because we might go camping once or twice a year. Car sharing or rentals really do fit the bill here, especially in an urban environment.

        • Tim

          The book “Carjacked – The culture of the Automobile & Its effect on our Lives” speaks very well to this. Peak needs. You can rent an SUV if you really need one. You can rent a motor home. What you can’t though is pull a trailer with a rental or a car share.

      • Tessa

        I disagree with the idea that you can’t raise a family without a car. While I always grew up with a car, several of my friends lived in families without cars. Most of these friends lived on the east side of Vancouver, which now that I think about it isn’t surprising, as they could walk a few blocks to the grocery store, to a medical clinic, to a restaurant or to transit easily. I don’t think their quality of life suffered at all. Though certainly not having a car limits what you can do in one day, so does having to drive an hour each way to get to and from work, or having to get in the car every time you need groceries. It’s much more convenient to live in a neighbourhood where those things you need are closer to you and not have a car than to have a car in a neighbourhood where cars are essential for life.

  5. Xander Crain

    Car2Go fuel cards were comprised recently and drivers become responsible for fuel costs.
    Has that happened yet?

    “Sharing isn’t always easy, especially when it comes to a car. The popular Car2Go program has experienced a rash of break-ins, leading to headaches for members.
    Over 20 of the little white and blue Smart Cars have been broken into this month (May 2012), with thieves making off with the shared fuel cards.
    As a result, hundreds of the cards have now been cancelled, leaving it in the hands, and wallets of members to fill-up. But that rubs many members, like Scott, the wrong way.”

    • Paul Hillsdon

      I haven’t heard of this being an issue

  6. Jesse L Hausner

    On the question about car use in the towers around SkyTrain, I can tell you that I think less people are driving these days. The parking lots under Park Place’ towers are typically half empty even in the evening. That’s with more than half of the towers filled.

    Now that isn’t taking into account the fact that some 2 bedroom units get 2 spots. But for the most part I think people are driving less. The issue though is still getting to and from work. Unfortunately unless you work along a SkyTrain route, you still typically need a car to get to and from work. I for example need to. The bus to my work goes down River Road and during rush hour can take 2 1/2 hours to get from my work to Scott Road station, a distance even in the worst traffic I can do in 25 minutes by car. So there isn’t a chance I will ever switch over to transit to go to work.

    I need a car for that reason. But living here now we find we drive a lot less. We’ve been riding our bikes around to go check out things. And instead of jumping in my car to drive up to Michaels for example, I’ll instead just walk across the street and hitch the 321 there and back.

    We’re still quite a ways off before we can be absolutely car free here but I’d argue even in Vancouver, having a car does make life easier. But it becomes more of a luxury closer to downtown than it does a necessity out here in the burbs. I do think you’re right though that in Surrey Central it is becoming less and less a necessity.

  7. Erik V

    to the people talking about a path along university drive
    they have finally added a separate gravel bike path under the skytrain guide way by gateway. Plus I know in the long term plans they do want to connect it to city park way and along in front of the mall to holland park. Which will add a nice route along central for people biking and rollerblading. Then add they’ve already done some of quibble creek greenways with some more coming soon. So there is the upper bike connections along Central.

    While we do not have bike routes on roads like Vancouver we do have our paved green way paths(as unconnected as they are. they are being worked on at least) They are great for short cuts off road ways for people biking, rollerblading, or even walking.

    • Tim

      I was thinking this can take place for the short term until the pathway section is complete. Right now we have the section along the park that is partway done and 100 m in front of the library.

  8. AdamWM

    I recently had to move from Richmond to Cloverdale. I would say it is almost impossible to be car free in Cloverdale specifically. I have been here three weeks and in that time I have seen one bus. I think Cloverdale has been left behind on the transit system far more than any other municipality in Surrey. I find this really odd considering the number of people who live here.

  9. John

    I’m a big fan of secure bike lockers at skytrain stations. I use them almost every day of the year, including weekends. But I should let you know Commercial-Broadway is one of the stations that does not offer lockers.